PRESS
ROOM
April
21, 1997
Elimination of Merger
Tax Loophole Will Impact Defense Industry Restructuring
Critics
of the controversial "Payoffs for Layoffs" proposed
legislation, which would repeal current defense contractor
reimbursements of restructuring costs by the DoD, picked up
considerable momentum recently when two powerful chairman
of the Republican Congress (Bill Archer of Texas/House Ways
and Means Committee and William V. Roth, Jr. of Delaware/Senate
Finance Committee) introduced bills to close the Morris Trust
tax loophole that allows companies to sell off defense assets
for billions without paying federal tax.
We anticipated that the volatile issue of avoiding federal
corporate tax would focus attention on the ongoing intense
merger activity in the defense sector, already questioned
in the pending General Motors Corporation sale of Hughes Electronics
to Raytheon Corporation for $9.5 billion without GM's payment
of federal taxes. Now the other shoe has dropped. We warned
our clients back in February, that the reimbursement of post-merger
restructuring costs by the DoD would likely be linked to tax
free sales, and perceived by the public as a double government
subsidy. Given that at least $500 billion in additional cuts
will be required to balance the budget by FY '02, opponents
are likely to seize on the broad "grandfathering"
of announced mergers as the equivalent of closing the barn
door after the horses have escaped. Since opponents will assert
that billions of taxable revenue could be grabbed this year
alone, the real battle will focus on congressional negotiations
to determine whether ongoing mergers will be considered and
remain, "grandfathered." Now is the time for targeted
contractors to decisively document the scope and value of
tax free "inducements" in valuing the transactional
price or financing terms under the Supreme Court's Winstar
doctrine. Changing policy "after the fact" may become
the ultimate insurance policy against the public mandate to
balance the budget and purge all appearances of corporate
welfare.
|
|